transport and logistics logo

Free ENews

EVENTS
DIESEL MAGAZINE ARTICLES
EDUCATION, CAREERS & PEOPLE
DATA CAPTURE, RFID & IT
ENVIRONMENT
GOVERNMENT & REGULATIONS
HOT PRODUCTS
MHD MAGAZINE ARTICLES
MATERIALS HANDLING
PROPERTIES FOR SALE & LEASE
PROPERTY NEWS
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
TRANSPORT & LOGISTICS SERVICES
TRUCK & TRAILER EQUIPMENT
WAREHOUSE/DC EQUIPMENT
INDUSTRY GROUPS
NEW / USED TRUCK & TRAILER
FREE E-NEWS
ADVERTISE
ARCHIVE SEARCH

 


Is congestion charging the answer?


Len Harper


One might say: the answer to what? Well, if you haven’t noticed, traffic congestion in the CBD and major arteries leading to the CBD, especially in Sydney and Melbourne, is an increasing problem, costing the community an estimated $9.4 billion a year across Australia.

And the situation is going to get worse with the proportionate increase in motor car travel and the progressive increase in freight movements. Indeed, the Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics estimated that congestion costs in Australia would balloon to some $20.4 billion by the year 2020.

Of course, there are the options of diverting traffic or spreading the peak but much of this is happening already. A far more effective option is to charge marginal users for the use of road space at peak times. In simple terms a congestion charge.

Congestion charging works by discouraging travel. A study in 2007 suggested that up to 40% of Sydney drivers during peak hours are on trips that could be made at any time of the day.

Congestion charging is not new. It has been around in Singapore since 1974, in Durham, UK, since 2002, in London since 2003 and Stockholm since 2007. In all instances there was a clear result of reduced congestion, higher use of public transport and cleaner air.

In London, there was a 26% reduction in the number of vehicles entering the City in the first six months. Most car travellers (55%) transferred to public transport, some 25% avoided the London area and the rest did not travel or travelled outside the hours.

Moreover, carbon emissions in London reduced by 15%.

Revenue generated by the congestion charging accounts for the equivalent of AUD625 million a year – half of which is targeted for investment in London’s transport infrastructure.

In Stockholm, the city government introduced a seven-month trial of congestion charging in 2006.

During the trial period, traffic into Stockholm reduced by 22%, mobility improved significantly, carbon emissions reduced by 14%, and public transport usage increased by 6%. The trial finished on 31 July 2006 and on the very next day traffic jams reappeared on the major arteries. Following the seven-month trial, a referendum of Stockholm residents voted in favour of the congestion tax on a permanent basis.

In summary, where congestion charging applies, traffic congestion has been reduced by about 25-30%. Public transport has increased by about 25% and carbon emissions have been reduced by about 15%. Importantly, the income raised from congestion charges is being used for improvements to public transport.

But is Australia ready for a congestion charge?

For a start, Sydney and Melbourne account for about 70% of traffic flows in Australian capital cities. Sydney alone accounts for 40% of the nation’s congestion costs.

The Business Council of Australia has recommended a congestion charge in a new report on infrastructure, “Roadmap for Reform”. The Council of Australian Governments (COAG) sees benefits for a congestion charge, finding that “congestion pricing measures stand out as the most effective option for alleviating congestion and improving the efficiency and productivity of the transport network.”

However, state governments to date have flatly rejected a congestion charge. The NSW Roads Minister Eric Roozendaal said recently: “There is no merit in putting tolls on free roads or setting up an exclusion zone around Australia’s biggest CBD.”

Notwithstanding, the newly-elected Federal Government is currently examining the option of differential pricing (peak-off/ peak) for motor traffic entering busy areas.

A main argument against congestion charging is that the public transport would not cope and we have to fix that firstly. Hold on, we have been trying to fix public transport in NSW for more than 30 years. Sure there have been real improvements but don’t use the lack of public transport as a reason for not making travel and environmental conditions better for a main part of the population. In fact, one of the benefits of the tax has been the opportunity to upgrade the public transport system through the proceeds of the tax income.

The opportunity exists in Australia to test the net benefits of congestion charging, just like they did in Stockholm. It is a real opportunity for politicians (state and federal) to tackle a real problem ‘in consultation’ with the community.

Len Harper is the executive director of the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport Australia (CILTA).



* Excerpted from Australasian Freight Logistics Issue 12, June/July 2008 (p.16)

227

  HOT PRODUCTS

 

Toyota Material Handling Australia

Toyota Material Handling Australia (TMHA) is poised to launch a new range of 1.5 to 3 tonne rated capacity at 500mm load centre four-wheel counter-balance battery electric forklifts.  more»

 

Internal Combustion Pneumatic Tyres Forklifts - 4.0 - 5.5 Tonnes

Mitsubishi GRENDIA Series Forklift, the Next generation, higher performance machine Outstanding performance...exceptional value for money.  more»

 

Involved in Logistics or Supply Chain Management?

If you are involved in logistics or supply chain management, and looking to advance your career, this internationally recognised qualification can provide you with the relevant skills for your future.  more»

 

Future Proof your Logistics Career Today

What does the future hold?  more»

 

Exquisitely Orchestrated Execution

Infor10 Supply Chain Execution – a single solution with one version of the truth so that everyone is moving in the same direction at the same time.  more»

 

Oracle Live Webcast: Effective HR in Manufacturing

Turn Strategy into Action in Manufacturing with Effective HR  more»

 

2012 National Challenge - Start Date: 16th APRIL, 2012

The Fresh Connection is an advanced web-based business simulation that challenges participants to work together as a team to demonstrate and improve their knowledge of the Value Chain.  more»

 

100% Error-Free Picking with KiSoft Vision

KiSoft Vision combined with the corresponding processes, ensures 100% error-free order picking. By using augmented reality technology KiSoft Vision visualizes information at the exact time and location the operator needs it, through a head mounted display  more»

Click here to view more Hot Products

Looking for a particular product?   Advanced Search.

  T&L PUBLICATIONS



MHD Supply Chain Solutions
Has been the industry leader for more than 30 years. It is the reference guide for professionals striving for effective end-to-end supply chain management...

Diesel
A bi-monthly magazine that has shaken up the Australian road transport magazine sector with sharp news stories and bold feature articles on the diverse character of the Australian trucking market...

 

 
VISIT INTERMEDIA SITES
 


 

 
The Intermedia Group (TIG) is a leading Australian B2B publishing, event management and technology business providing the most comprehensive and targeted B2B advertising network in Australia.

TIG's brands are a leading source of vital information for Australian and New Zealand businesses within the following 12 vertical markets: Beauty, Construction, Electronics, Entertainment, Government, Health, Homewares, Hospitality, Interior Design, Logistics, Motoring, Procurement, Retail, Recreation and Technology

Intermedia Websites