How should we change laws for automated trucks?

How should we change laws for automated trucks?

The National Transport Commission (NTC) is asking road transport agencies, police, and industry to provide input on how Australian governments should amend driver laws to facilitate the introduction of automated vehicles.

The NTC has released a discussion paper Changing driving laws to support automated vehicles that seeks to clarify how current driver and driving laws apply to automated vehicles and who would be legally responsible for their operation.

Chief executive of the NTC Paul Retter said current driving laws were developed before automated vehicles were envisaged. They therefore assume the driver is a human.

“The introduction of more automated vehicles will see elements of the driving task shift away from the human driver to the automated driving system but our laws currently don’t recognise these systems,” Mr Retter said.

“We need to ensure that relevant driving laws apply to automated vehicles when the automated driving system—rather than the human driver—is operating the vehicle.”

This work is one of seven projects—five of which are being led by the NTC and a further two led by the states/territories but for which the NTC is coordinating the findings and subsequent ministerial recommendations. These projects were approved by ministers in November 2016 as part of the NTC’s roadmap of reform to support the commercial deployment of automated vehicles.

“We have been tasked with identifying, and if necessary, removing, legislative impediments to automated vehicles. But we must also maintain the intent of existing laws—to ensure the safe operation of vehicles on Australian roads.

“Legislation must recognise a legal entity that can be held responsible for the automated driving system,” Mr Retter said.

The NTC’s discussion paper raises 14 questions relating to current driver laws. The key question is:

Should driving laws change to allow an automated driving system (ADS) to drive — rather than a human — and ensure that an entity is responsible for the actions of the vehicle when the ADS is driving?

The NTC is seeking feedback on options to reform laws to achieve this and other issues that arise if the ADS is legally permitted to drive.

Submissions for this discussion paper are open until 4pm, Friday, 24 November 2017 via the NTC website.

This project is closely aligned to the NTC’s work on developing a safety assurance system. The outcomes of the safety assurance work will also inform the recommendations of this project.

Following consultation on this paper, the NTC will present reform options to transport ministers in May 2018.

 

 

You may also like to read:


, , , , ,

Comments are closed.

Newsletter

Sign up with your business email address to keep up with the latest industry news from T&L. Newsletter sent every week.

Most Read

Queensland’s circular bioeconomy in the world news
This article appeared in the Biofuels Digest - USA. Photo co...
Truck crashes should get workplace investigations
The TWU is demanding that fatal truck crashes be investigate...
Automation is the buzzword – from MHD magazine
Paul May Faster, cheaper, smarter. Feeling the squeeze from...
The I-curve – from MHD magazine
The Amazon effect Industry experts are still divided on t...
Hi 5 to I4.0 – from MHD magazine
Tom Rentschler Many have written about the impact that Indu...
The automotive supply chain is about to go electric
BMW's Mini production line in Oxfordshire, UK. Photo courtes...

Supported By